Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre-Louis Boitel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  DGG ( talk ) 01:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Pierre-Louis Boitel

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and notability criteria for politicians and judges. The only source in the article is a captioned picture and I can not find anything else in reliable sources. Jbh Talk  21:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Jbh  Talk  21:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions.  Jbh  Talk  21:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.  Jbh  Talk  21:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I am currently searching for news articles directly. Thank you for your concern. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rigleybr (talk • contribs) 21:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Liberland doesn't even have an established diplomatic relationship with the country that Boitel is supposedly "ambassador" to — which makes him not a real "ambassador" in the conventional sense, but merely a personal friend of the micronation's "president" who was given a courtesy "title" just because he happens to live in France. However, diplomats are not automatically presumed notable just because they exist, even in real established countries with real diplomatic recognition — and they are definitely not presumed notable if they're the "ambassadors" of virtually unrecognized micronations. Ambassadors are accepted as notable enough for articles if they can be properly sourced as the subject of enough reliable source coverage about them to clear GNG, but not if their only "source" is a photograph on a non-notable photographer's self-published personal website. Bearcat (talk) 22:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete not enough reliable secondary sources to satisfy GNG. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 03:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per above by other editors WikiHannibal (talk) 10:45, 15 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.