Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre-Marie Dupuy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:01, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Pierre-Marie Dupuy

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject lacks notability under WP:ACADEMIC Divide et Impera (talk) 02:13, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Unless the facts stated in the "Life" section of the article are being questioned, it looks to me that he has held sufficient positions at a series of academic institutions, to which we can add his roles as an international jurist (documented in the article, in the external links and in a Google Books search). AllyD (talk) 17:44, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  —Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:15, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  —Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:15, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  —Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:15, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions.  —Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:15, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  —Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:15, 27 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per AllyD. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:37, 27 August 2011 (UTC).
 * Keep I added some references and information on the notability of Mr. Dupuy that I hope underline the reasons why I created the article. Kelsaab (talk) 20:40, 28 August 2011 (UTC).
 * Keep Agree with the above: the subject seems to have played an important role as a jurist and visiting scholar.--BlueonGray (talk) 11:56, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nomination: this seems a clear keep per notability that the subject has per se and for these improving edits. Divide et Impera (talk) 19:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.