Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Ducasse (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 04:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Pierre Ducasse

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN.--NL19931993 (talk) 23:41, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:29, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:29, 31 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep as meeting WP:GNG based on the sources. No indication nom did a before on any of the Green Party leaders they AFD'd. ミラP 00:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Definitely enough reliable sources to be notable. -- Earl Andrew - talk 00:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - While the mass AfD of provincial Green Party leaders is probably fine, I think that Ducasse (as Layton's Quebec lieutenant and a former federal leadership contestant) might have enough coverage to pass WP:GNG. Bkissin (talk) 14:42, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep meets GNG. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) (click me!)    22:57, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep based on the reliable sources. Passes our notability guidelines. Wm335td (talk) 19:26, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep. I check all of reference so, Based on reliable sources, Passes WP:GNG.- Nahal (T) 20:59, 6 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.