Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Foldès


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:55, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Pierre Foldès

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

delete This is an extremely fringe person of little notariety to consider for inclusion. Some of the related surgical techniques are ok (but even they are so super tertiary multiple entries overdo things), but as far as I can tell there is nothing to distinguish this person within my field of surgery to be featured Droliver 07:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * delete i fail to see how this is properly attributed or how it asserts notability. /Blaxthos 09:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
 * keep an award winning book was written about his work, as well as a number of news articles, clearly meeting WP:BIO. However, they are generally French sources. Even so, his work is pioneering - he's not just doing boob jobs. Ciotog 05:36, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * keep. Lampman 16:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:ATT.  The inventor himself may be only slightly notable, but I can't see how the relevant surgical information could be merged seamlessly with Female genital cutting, and the subject is encyclopedic.  ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 09:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article meets the attribution policy and the sources seem to establish notability.  I'm not sure about notoriety, but in any case, that's not relevant to inclusion criteria.  -- Black Falcon 22:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.