Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Salinger syndrome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Pierre Salinger syndrome
This appears to fail WP:NEO. None of the sources confirms the usage of the term, which does not have widespread acceptance. Ohconfucius 05:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. [Check Google hits]. About 3,300 or so, most of which mirror this article but some do not. Here's WordSpy with one other source besides Moira Gunn. It's real, but it just isn't in wide use, and I think that's because the Internet is no longer such a new technology and its limitations are well known. I doubt it will elicit a glimmer of recognition in ten years, let alone one. Daniel Case 18:03, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologism. &mdash;tregoweth (talk) 11:50, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, indeed a pretty clear and mostly non-notable neologism. --Jaysweet 19:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems the very definition of a protoneologism. Funny though to say the popularity of a phrase about believing in things because they are on the internet is proved because it is on the internet.Scarykitty 09:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.