Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pig with the Face of a Boy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 09:02, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Pig with the Face of a Boy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

nn music band - üser:Altenmann >t 05:40, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  07:05, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  07:05, 11 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, article doesn't explain why the band is notable and the first four results on a Google search are the band's website, Facebook page, YouTube video and their blog, so it's unlikely that they're actually notable enough.  Seagull123  Φ  21:38, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as mentioned as simply none of this suggests better satisfying the notability guidelines. SwisterTwister   talk  05:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep, consider refocusing article and moving to A Complete History of the Soviet Union, Arranged to the Melody of Tetris. This is interesting. The band is a one-hit wonder: their first song, A Complete History of the Soviet Union, Arranged to the Melody of Tetris, garnered over five million Youtube views, became quite an Internet hit, and may well be notable enough for a standalone article (much like many of the songs listed at List of Internet phenomena). However, per nom, it's not certain that the band itself meets Wikipedia's notability standards. Thus I suggest keeping the article, but seriously consider moving it and changing its focus to that one song. Chessrat  ( talk, contributions ) 04:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm far from convinced the song deserves its own article but anyone deleting this article should certainly quickly put the song on Internet Phenomena/music. Neutral on deleting this article. Blythwood (talk) 07:27, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Do you have any reliable sources about the song besides YT stats and self-bragging? - üser:Altenmann >t 07:32, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Self-bragging? I don't understand how you think I'm bragging? Confused here. Reliable sources about the song? It's referenced on plenty of websites; just try a google search. Don't know how many of those constitute reliable sources, though // The main issue with creating an article for the song is not finding sources; that's easy. The issue is proving that the song is notable enough for its own article. (and, if not, should it be given a section on List of Internet phenomena?) Chessrat  ( talk, contributions ) 11:48, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per WP:GNG and WP:BAND. While there are plenty of websites that you can visit to listen to their music, there doesn't appear to exist any secondary reliable sources that cover this band in-depth and to the point where no original research is needed to write an article on them (see significant coverage in WP:GNG). The closest sources I could find were here, here, here, and here. These sources cover Tetris and merely mention the band once - this is not in-depth coverage. I saw two sources within the article that looked promising, but this source just displays a blank page, and this is a dead link. Hence this article fails WP:GNG. Looking at WP:BAND, it seems that this band does not meet any of the criterion listed (and note item #1). Hence I believe that this band also fails WP:BAND. This band may be gaining traction in the music world, but it is WP:TOOSOON for an article at this time.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   12:01, 13 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.