Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pigeon Mountain Industries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 05:29, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Pigeon Mountain Industries

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Seems to fail NCORP (notability tag on the article since 2011), written like an advertisement. The very few sources are either primary or behind a paywall. Liliana UwU (talk / contribs) 06:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contribs) 06:05, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Georgia (U.S. state). AllyD (talk) 06:56, 28 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Did a quick Google search and found nothing substantial. A single article in a local newspaper does not warrant inclusion on Wikipedia — V ORTEX  3427 (Talk!) 06:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.