Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piggy (Mutual Fund)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Piggy (Mutual Fund)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:ORGCRITE, financial express source is reliable, but this company is not the sole focus. Other sources might not qualify. Also somehow the username of the creator led me to evidence for COI on this article, can't say how because of WP:OUTING. Daiyusha (talk) 08:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Ruyaba  ( talk ) 08:11, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Ruyaba  ( talk ) 08:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 08:34, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Promotional article for a start-up company. Britishfinance (talk) 21:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 02:07, 15 February 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. An in-depth reference need not be primarily about the topic. The Financial Express discussion of Piggy is more than a passing mention. Some of the other references are from reliable sources as well. The article does not seem unduly promotional. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 02:53, 15 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment - I took a look at the Financial Express article. It seems rather promotional and I'm not confident that it would be an RS. Or am I mistaken? I am leaning towards delete, but willing to learn more. Skirts89 15:55, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 07:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - promotional, no indication of notability from reliable sources. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 04:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - lacking the in-depth coverage required to meet WP:NCORP; the one-paragraph description in the Financial Express does not do it for me. In addition, this startup company (a label used by multiple sources) may fall under WP:TOOSOON.--SamHolt6 (talk) 01:17, 25 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.