Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piggyback art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Piggyback art
non-notable neologism applied to/by only one artist. Article itself states "a search of Google with the words 'breen' & 'edbreen' excluded results in a mere 140 results." &mdash;Hanuman Das 17:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per my nom. &mdash;Hanuman Das 17:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Normally, I'd say to merge with Eddie Breen (who is notable), but since that article doesn't exist, it's probably best to delete for now. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Yeah, if Eddie Breen existed, I'd have just merged and redirected... &mdash;Hanuman Das 21:21, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Gogo Dodo 00:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.