Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pigs in north carolina


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete. —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 01:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Pigs in north carolina

 * — (View AfD)

Some sort of nonsense about the number of pigs in North Carolina. Was marked for speedy with, but author removed tag, then copied a whole section from Pig onto the article. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 21:59, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If the statement about the number of pigs in North Carolina is valid, merge it into an agricultural statistics list. Anthony Appleyard 22:05, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete per A7 and because it does not add any particularly new notable information not already in Pig (and in fact appears to be cut-and-paste from the Pig article). Tarinth 22:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete You know, I've heard that the number of pigs in North Carolina has tripled in the past six months... anyway, this should be trashed. -- Kicking222 22:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per above and warn the author not to remove speedy tags from articles he created. MartinDK 22:24, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per common sense. One unsourceable and possibly nonsensical factoid does not make an article. And as for the second half, there's already a good article about pigs; it's at Pig. -- Kinu t /c  23:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this non-sense. TSO1D 00:11, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.