Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pigsback.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:34, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Pigsback.com
Promotion for commercial service, fails WP:WEB. Prod contested: "Deletion is contested as this website's notability is increasing; if it is deleted just transfer it to my userspace. SunStar Net 10:48, 30 October 2006 (UTC)" -- Femto 12:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete and do not userfy. "Notability is increasing" is unprovable without sources and we don't go by presumed future notability anyway. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:12, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Also possibly speedy delete under CSD G11. Notice the second and third paragraph. Imo  eng  14:23, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Del per nom. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 16:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete this hogswash as per nom. Emeraude 18:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Regardless of whether it is notable or not, it is written in bad format and looks and feels like an ad. SupaStarGirl 20:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I'll go with the consensus now. It makes more sense to do so. SunStar Net 22:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, hopelessly short of any of the criteria for inclusion. Article author can only offer crystal-ballery. My Alt Account 02:20, 31 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.