Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pik-Shuen Fung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nominator blocked as a likely sockpuppet with no other deletion proposals. (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 19:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

Pik-Shuen Fung

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NWRITER Bushxingu (talk) 13:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bushxingu (talk) 13:09, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 13:14, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article explicitly details that she just won a major national literary award that passes WP:NAUTHOR, and already cites four solid WP:GNG-worthy sources. What could possibly be the argument that she fails NAUTHOR at all? (Also, the creator is a brand new user who has already initiated four AFD discussions within 10 minutes of their first ever Wikipedia edit? Hmmmmmm.) Bearcat (talk) 13:11, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I have posted this to ANI. MaxnaCarter (talk) 14:01, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - The subject of this article meets WP:ANYBIO criterion #1, as they received a well-known and significant award or honor, they also have received significant coverage in reliable sources per WP:GNG. Netherzone (talk) 14:38, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment. This editor just started editing today, made exactly 10 edits and then started deleting articles. Jacona (talk) 15:08, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm not sure whether or not AUTHOR is met, but I agree there is a claim to meeting ANYBIO #1; also there are already four decent sources meeting GNG; as the award is recent, more sources are likely to appear. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:19, 3 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.