Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilar Neira


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 17:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Pilar Neira

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage can be found. Paul Vaurie (talk) 00:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football,  and Spain. Paul Vaurie (talk) 00:40, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Article has been expanded and a number of sources added. Sources are not plentiful, but in light of the well-reported issue of sexism in Spanish football this is unsurprising. Even if she is not strictly within the WP:NSPORT guideline, as a national team coach, Olympic coach, etc., she has been a trailblazer in women's soccer in Spain. Oblivy (talk) 01:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep with the new changes and sources. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails GNG with a lack of significant coverage on her. Q+A interviews like the La Opinion A Coruna and Xornal sources do not provide sigcov. Dougal18 (talk) 10:27, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - Per Oblivy and Utopes. Clearly significan tfigure in Spanish womens football. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Could you please provide some actual arguments? You do this on every AfD... "per someone else" without defending anything. Paul Vaurie (talk) 00:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * For example,, , and all have secondary coverage... Clearly significan tfigure in Spanish womens football THanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 07:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * First source offers little coverage, second source is a primary source (direct Q&A interview), and third source is also a primary source interview. Paul Vaurie (talk) 01:43, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
 * They literally a;; have secondary coverage... Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 17:51, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:36, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources above which show notability. GiantSnowman 16:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep passes WP:GNG after even a cursory source review. SportingFlyer  T · C  12:52, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.