Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilchini


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Delete G3 Obvious Hoax RN 19:03, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Pilchini

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable cocktail. Author says it has been "verified" but only that cites will be added eventually once some ext source does...something. Well that's the definition of WP:V failure at this time, an article that is at this time crystal-balling on its future status and upcoming popularity. If and when it does become notable according to reliable sources, then it would merit an article, written in a factual tone. DMacks (talk) 15:18, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, this is just vandalism, it's a copypaste of Martini (cocktail) with a few words changed and a lot of bullshit thrown in. No need to keep this around for a week. Hairhorn (talk) 15:20, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete. I agree with Hairhorn. Very essay-like and POV. Sentences like "The Pilchini is not a drink for idiots, not your average wanker off the street can create this masterpiece." make the article seem like a joke. GorillaWarfare  talk 15:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:NFT. Pichpich (talk) 15:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:29, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Can't bring myself to speedy this, too much on the edge of the policy (It's a partial A10 duplicate & G3 hoax/vandalism combo), but if another admin wants to, go ahead. I enjoyed the bit about "'Well frankly, my dear. I don't give a damn'. If James Bond had known about the Pilchini, he would have been downing those by the dozen." though.... RN 17:05, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * What part of this hoax isn't obvious? Have you tried Googling "Pilchini"? Hairhorn (talk) 18:23, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * At the time yes, I'll speedy it anyway; it's close enough. RN 19:03, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.