Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilkingtons Buses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:24, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Pilkingtons Buses

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable bus company, Found one indepth source with the rest being trivial mentions, Fails NCORP & GNG – Davey 2010 Talk 12:57, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  15:16, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Jupitus Smart  15:16, 18 May 2017 (UTC)


 * delete fails WP:CORP. Just a local bus company with no broader significance. LibStar (talk) 15:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Significant regional company . Rightly or wrongly, we have always been very inclusive for transportation, .  DGG ( talk ) 18:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * - Hundreds if not thousands of bus company articles have been deleted and I don't see why this should be any different, Ofcouse if you can find any indepth and reliable sources/coverage I'd happily withdraw. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:37, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * hundreds have been deleted, and hundred kept. I have always !voted delete myself for ones running one or two routes.  DGG ( talk ) 05:15, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * because hundreds have been kept is not a reason for keeping as per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. LibStar (talk) 05:36, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * DGG - Nope sorry to disagree but most have been deleted with a few being kept, With all due respect you !vote Keep on any transport article without even looking at the article or the sources (I'm not having a go but I'm just saying it how it is), As I said tho groans aside if you can provide indepth coverage I'd be more than happy to withdraw however a company running more than 2-3 routes isn't a reason to keep. – Davey 2010 Talk 18:48, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * how is it a "significant regional company"? LibStar (talk) 00:49, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Only real coverage seems to be in the Accrington Observer, and there's not much even there. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 20:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: It's only available offline and I don't have access to it right now, but I recall seeing a lot of coverage of this company in Buses magazine over the years. Perhaps someone with a complete archive could check this out, because the online sources certainly aren't sufficient. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:630:D0:ED2B:E164:B2F1:6A5E:745F (talk) 15:09, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Just not enough sources to establish notability. -- HighKing ++ 20:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.