Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pill Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  keep. Non-admin closure.  Jujutacular  T · C 07:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Pill Awards
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable awards for a non-notable public access show. ADD-TV is similarly nominated for deletion. Angryapathy (talk) 21:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 02:37, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep but posssibly Merge with ADD-TV - To my surprise, LGBT publications across the US have written about these awards. Also, the event itself seems to be a big deal in which nominees (some of whom are notable) actually show up and peform. --Griseum (talk) 15:24, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:51, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * I added 10 references to help editors decide whether or not this should be kept. If the person who created this article knew what they were doing I don't think it would have gone to AfD. --Griseum (talk) 11:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( X! ·  talk )  · @155  · 02:42, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm convinced of notability after Griseum's sourcing additions. Wine Guy  ~Talk  02:32, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Weak Keep It would help if the article said what the Pill Awards were offered for, and if the recipients were listed by year, with their achievement, and a citation for each. --Bejnar (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks like there are multiple, independent, secondary sources. Good enough.  --Joe Decker (talk) 22:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.