Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pill Hill Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:06, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Pill Hill Press

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I had half a mind to speedy this, as it doesn't seem to even assert notability, let alone establish it, but in an effort to not WP:BITE the new user who contributed this and another article which I did speedy, this is coming here by way of also skipping the formality of PROD. A whopping 246 ghits, which seem to all be either self-sources or something else entirely that shares the name "Pill Hill Press." No indication of any notability. Nosleep break my slumber 08:43, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  --  treelo  radda  13:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  --  treelo  radda  13:19, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: No indication of notability — which makes sense, as it was founded in June 2009 Billbowery (talk) 05:01, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - no coverage in reliable sources to establish notability -- Whpq (talk) 15:52, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.