Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pillarhurst Cabins


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:41, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Pillarhurst Cabins

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD removed by article creator with no explanation. Unsourced (single ref makes no mention of subject) article about what I assume from reference are a small group of wooden buildings that burnt down killing some people in 1911. Where, the article does not say. Absolutely zip online to expand this article: if there was probably content belongs in the article on the settlement (possibly Malpeque Bay, Prince Edward Island, a stub)Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete for reasons above. --Rob (talk) 03:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is no context for the information given.  Where was this?  The visible text says only “Malpeque”.  The referenced Webpage is about PEI, but as two previous editors have pointed out, that page does not mention this title, and so may be unrelated.  (I've added a PEI stub template anyway.)  What was this?  Was this an attempt to settle a new community?  If so, who were the other settlers, and what happened to them?  Alternately, there are hints that this was a commercial lodging business, described as “a successful cluster of cabins” with a “proprietor” which “closed September 1911” and “was sold”.  If that's true, the article should say so.  All of these issues could be resolved quickly with one or two real sources, but since none were provided and finding any online has been unsuccessful, I've got to side with delete.  Unician &nabla; 10:34, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.