Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pillow talk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 14:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Pillow talk

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Original research, unreferenced, unverifiable, etc. I ran a couple scholarly database searches and find no evidence the term is in use by psychologists or sociologists except perhaps tongue-in-cheek. If the consensus here moves toward deletion, I'd also like to ask contributors to this debate to think about what we want to do with the pagename, which could be used for the Pillow talk (disambiguation) or one of the two items on it (which I'd favor, since there are only two). Chick Bowen 21:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep No problem with this being the topic of an article. As it is it has no sources however. Redddogg (talk) 22:17, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Google searches indicate that the term is a widespread - hence notable - term. A better person than I will have to scratch together the sources. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 22:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment As it is the article gives useful information to a person who wants to know what "pillow talk" is. Redddogg (talk) 22:26, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Google returns articles from no less than the Washington Post. I don't have time to edit this one, but I'll back up the person that does. philosofool (talk) 00:02, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Maybe someone can make this more than the dictionary-definition article that it is currently, but unless there's a sign of improvement, that's what Wiktionary is for. Mandsford (talk) 00:11, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It's sufficiently notable that it's the title of a Academy-Award winning film--see the disam page. DGG (talk) 01:32, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Google search indicates the term is widespread. Here are two references . More references can be easily found.  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 09:23, 30 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.