Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilot und Flugzeug


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Fram (talk) 13:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Pilot und Flugzeug

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence in any language that this m magazine is in any way notable. Creator seemed to agree on the talk page about a year ago. Travellingcari (talk) 17:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's ironic that we look for articles about a subject from certain sources to establish notability of that subject, but some editors find those same sources un-notable. Also ironically, the google news link provided by the nom above demonstrates that this magazine is frequently reference by some of the most prestigious publications in the world like Die Welt and the Financial Times --Oakshade (talk) 02:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
 * comment: the edit history shows that the creator twice blanked the page, and despite being the only contributor of substantial content was twice reverted (once explicitly as a "vandal"). A few days later the only other substantial edits were made by "Janbrill" (coincidentally the name of the editor of the publication in question is Jan Brill, and these are the only two edits Janbrill ever made). Is it not normal to delete under these circumstances? Of course, if other editors beyond the creator are asserting and demonstrating notability, the article should be kept. --Paularblaster (talk) 23:10, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * KEEP, falls within guidlines of WP:CORP.--Sallicio$\color{Red} \oplus$ 10:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * comment, as annoying as it is for the article creator to be vandalizing his own creation, the article itself is notable for Germany as Road & Track is to the US. So the article is keepable per guidelines, but is irrelevant for me personally.--Sallicio$\color{Red} \oplus$ 10:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.