Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilpeled


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There's little discussion of the actual sources.  Sandstein  11:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Pilpeled

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable Artist,fails to pass WP:GNG Padavalam🌂   ►  17:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Padavalam🌂   ►  17:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  Padavalam🌂   ►  17:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.  Padavalam🌂   ►  17:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - promotional article, but there's not enough in-depth sourcing found to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NARTIST.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:34, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Pilpeled is a very known artist in Israel. the article is well sourced, and actually is like the Hebrew article פילפלד. Do pass both WP:GNG, and WP:NARTIST. Ovedc (talk) 06:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I could not find any in-depth sources about him, Btw Other language wikis are not considered to prove his notability -- Padavalam🌂   ►  07:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , Thank you for your remark, I added much more 3rd-party references from around the world, please read and re-consider your opinion, Thanks!

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 05:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The article is supported by reliable sources on Pilpeled and his work (e.g., ) which are independent and whose coverage is non-trivial. Adumbrativus (talk) 07:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Pilpeled is an artist with a proven record of international activity for years, including exhabitions in important museums and works for international brands, like Coca Cola and Puma. The article is written well in an encyclopedic style and it is based on a variety of sources. So it should be kept.Anatbc (talk) 11:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I see decent coverage in a search. Meets GNG. It is not helping things that someone related to the artist appears to have been editing the page promotionally. Possibly (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.