Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilsen Neighbors Community Council


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete, after extended time for discussion. bd2412 T 04:36, 8 November 2018 (UTC)

Pilsen Neighbors Community Council

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I found no significant coverage for this local organization per WP:ORG. SL93 (talk) 00:27, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:21, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:21, 21 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment A Google Scholar search threw up quite a few hits - the ones I clicked on were behind paywalls however, so I wasn't able to establish whether they would count as significant coverage. Have you checked these? Girth Summit  (blether) 10:25, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete My search didn't find the significant coverage required by the GNG. There were lots of passing mentions, but most were about the Fiesta del Sol and were in the "things to do this weekend" category. They appear to be a local organization doing good work, but they're not notable.Sandals1 (talk) 14:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep on account of subject adequately meeting criteria of Wikinotability. We find it in sources such as ABC7 (here), The Chicago Sun Times; (here), South Side Weekly (here), Univision Chicago (here), etc. Also in books:
 * -The Gnome (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * -The Gnome (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * -The Gnome (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * -The Gnome (talk) 10:17, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: It would be most useful if people would evaluate the sources presented by.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 14:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep per User:The Gnome. I see no issue in his sources (although much of one of them is behind a paywall), and this article thereby meets WP:GNG. --John M Wolfson (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.