Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pim Conradi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:23, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Pim Conradi

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable artist, no reliable surces provided, nor can I find any. My speedy deletion tag was removed. Woogee (talk) 20:44, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 22:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete - There is a large amount of blog coverage, but those aren't reliable sources. He is the artists in residence at Area 10, but I have no idea if that is notable.  A Google Scholar search  points to an article about holography.  Perhaps somebody with JSTOR access can see what the coverage is like.  There is a hint of coverage that would identify his role in hologrpahy here.  And this indicates that the artists has gone by "Pim Giebels", and "James R.Conradi".  A search with the other names don't really turn up anything more significant.  -- Whpq (talk) 16:54, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is no really good proof of notability and the whole thing smacks of promotion. Borderline speedy if not for the references.  PMDrive1061 (talk) 02:34, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Some more sources:.  Ty  16:53, 25 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong delete - none of the references listed above support notability. Please read WP:ARTIST - you need to cite non-trivial coverage, those links are to trivial coverage. ukexpat (talk) 18:35, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.