Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pina Albo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. clear consensus  DGG ( talk ) 02:49, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

Pina Albo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Article is created by a paid editor. Not many sources exist beyond press releases. Rusf10 (talk) 02:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 02:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 02:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 02:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 02:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 02:34, 29 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete The article creator disclosed that they are a paid editor, so no issue there. However the sources provided are all industry junk, so notability is not established.198.58.168.40 (talk) 07:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree. scope_creep (talk) 12:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a free alternative to LinkedIn. Being CEO of a company is not an automatic notability freebie under our notability standards for businesspeople, but the sources here are all business directories and press releases rather than independent media attention being organically given to her. A person needs to be the subject of media coverage, not just press releases from her own company, to qualify for an article.Bearcat (talk) 17:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, Bearcat's summary is exactly what I thought about the article.  PK  T (alk)  16:16, 2 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.