Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinanas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 14:50, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Pinanas

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable advertising campaign and/or April Fools' Day joke. Frank |  talk  20:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete non-notable. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 01:33, 13 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete G3 - it's an April Fools joke, which the article even admits. ~  Baron Von Yiffington  . talk . contribs 16:53, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose speedy deletion (but still support deletion) - I do not think this satisfies G3 as vandalism because the subject of the article itself is not made up. A page should only be considered a hoax/vandalism if its deliberatly false.  While the article's subject has to do with someone making something up, the fact that they DID make it up is still true. Still, I think it's non-notable and should be deleted (just not under CSD). Nick—Contact/Contribs 17:21, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge to Waitrose. It certainly is not a G3 speedy delete ("blatant hoaxes" in G3 refers to something that the article's creator made up, not a reliably-sourced article about someone else's joke -- there's a big difference).  However, this wasn't notable as far as hoaxes went-- got a newswire story about it  on the day it happened, but seems to have missed out on any historic notability .  Mandsford (talk) 21:11, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is not made up and should be kept because it is a notable event. Chocolate4921 18:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocolate4921 (talk • contribs)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.