Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinata games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unopposed deletion.  Sandstein  07:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Pinata games

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Rather open and shut case of non-notability as it was a newly formed company which seemed to have closed within a year despite hopes of a Catalyst Game labs connection, and with their website is closed and my searches finding nothing better than this, there's nothing to suggest this company had a better legacy and existence (I'm not even seeing anything to suggest mentioning at Catalyst's article). This also hasn't changed much since starting in November 2008 and chances are it's not going to change. SwisterTwister  talk  05:46, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:46, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:47, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:12, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 00:17, 1 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:18, 8 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SwisterTwister   talk  04:12, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches did not turn up anything to show it meets either WP:GNG or WP:NCORP.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.