Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pine Valley (All My Children) (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Pine Valley (All My Children)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG/WP:N. Article is WP:FANCRUFT/WP:LISTCRUFT of fictional places within the universe of a soap opera. No WP:RS for any content in article, and only external link is a dead link to a fansite.

Earlier AFD keep votes do not address WP:GNG and amount to WP:ILIKEIT/WP:OTHERSTUFF. Two book sources linked in earlier AFD do not amount to WP:SIGCOV that would satisfy other WP:GNG requirements.

AldezD (talk) 17:12, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AldezD (talk) 17:17, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Seems detailed and referenced to me.--DThomsen8 (talk) 12:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment—The article contains only two references, both referring to a crossover with One Life to Live. The bulk of the article is entirely unreferenced WP:IINFO and contains multiple sentence fragments. AldezD (talk) 12:18, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:13, 22 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not sufficiently sourced, not enough independant coverage in reliable sources, bad article quality, and more than a year old. Müdigkeit (talk) 11:37, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG, no indication anywhere that this is a notable topic, no secondary sources discussing this fictional locality, also the article is very much WP:FANCRUFT Kraxler (talk) 14:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.