Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pingoat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  19:29, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Pingoat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unambiguously promotional article with no notability and no references whatsoever. BiH (talk) 16:42, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:04, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Clearly written for advertisement purpose. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. Rafaelgriffin (talk) 18:03, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - software article of unclear notability lacking sufficient reliable sourcing. The two refs in the article are incidental mentions, and a search did not turn up any significant RS coverage.Dialectric (talk) 18:41, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete didn't even open the article but I feel safe in heralding my support to throw this one off the train BlueSalix (talk) 19:49, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. What if all the people behind deleted projects and companies got together and did a "We're important, too" benefit concert? It would get so much press that we—I mean they—would finally get an article and could die in peace knowing that it gets three views per day. Ringbang (talk) 02:04, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.