Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pingshan Center station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 15:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Pingshan Center station

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Have attempted tagging and redirecting this article, hoping that it would be improved. Currently, there is not a single in-depth source. Fails GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:06, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and China. Shellwood (talk) 15:44, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep This will be an interchange station in the future so it doesn't make sense to redirect it to the line article. Interchange stations ought to have their own articles to aid navigation. Garuda3 (talk) 18:41, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * This vote does not even attempt to give a policy-based reason for the retention of the article, and should be ignored by the closer. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The policy is WP:IAR. I have presented a valid reason why I feel this article should be kept. The station is also likely to receive more coverage as the connecting line is constructed. "The closer" doesn't need your instructions. Garuda3 (talk) 20:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I'll simply trust that the closer will ignore your nonsense vote, then. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've added some references to the article, which now has six. But admittedly three of the sources I added only mention Pingshan Center Station in passing. Only one of the sources in the article goes into any detail about the station. Based on this, I think it's borderline at best, but because other stations on the line clearly pass GNG, there's something to be said for keeping all of them for the sake of consistency. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Line 14 (Shenzhen Metro). Fails GNG. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 13:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I added two more video sources from local news outlets that talk about the station in general & the destinations it serves respectively:
 * Jumpytoo Talk 22:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Jumpytoo Talk 22:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Jumpytoo Talk 22:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. Sufficient sourcing available to meet WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep sufficient sourcing found and meets gng

NotOrrio (talk) 12:45, 15 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.