Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pingshanwei station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:59, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Pingshanwei station

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Have attempted tagging and redirecting this article, hoping that it would be improved. Currently, there is not a single in-depth source. Fails GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 00:56, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Non-notable station. --John B123 (talk) 07:01, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation and China.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:39, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Article has been expanded since nomination. As this is an interchange station on multiple lines, it doesn't make sense to redirect it to a line article. Garuda3 (talk) 12:32, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. In addition to the seven sources currently in the article, a quick search found several others: . I suspect a more thorough search would find more. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 15:21, 9 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep as per Mx Grangers research the fact that there were 6 sources found shows that the nominator has not done any research prior to nominating the article
 * NotOrrio (talk) 15:16, 10 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. Sufficient sourcing to meet WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:37, 14 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.