Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pink Man


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 07:11, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Pink Man

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My gut response upon reading this article is, "Are you kidding me?" Yes, there is some coverage... But no, I don't think this is sufficiently notable, and if somehow notable, encyclopedic. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 01:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:32, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Sufficient coverage. No valid reason for deletion. --Michig (talk) 21:55, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Michig. i checked the refs, they are solid coverage. Whether he deserves coverage, thus notability, is not our concern: hes got it, warts and all. PS: he is actually an incredibly skilled unicyclist.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:37, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per references. DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:09, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.