Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinnacle Apartments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 02:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Pinnacle Apartments

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable apartment development. The one reference in the article only demonstrates its existence but not that it's notable. My searches find a ton of real estate listings and similar but not the kind of in-depth coverage which would suggest notability. Neiltonks (talk) 12:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Neiltonks (talk) 12:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Commment, the article [used to have] 8 references, not one. At the time the article was written, the building was the tallest building in Newcastle. There are now taller buildings, and the article in it's current state is a (poor) attempt at listing the tallest buildings in Newcastle. Plantdrew (talk) 15:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment: I rewrote the page and added a few sources to the article (also removed the 1st person language). I can only find 3 sources that mention this property (none of which show it completed, all seem to be before the property was built) and the page is still a stub (3 sentences). 199.192.65.251 (talk) 00:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete based on User:199.192.65.251 comment "I can only find 3 sources", none of which are notable, fails WP:GNG MetricMaster (talk) 10:00, 23 March 2023 (UTC) This user has made 47 edits to Wikipedia. Their contribution history shows that 38 of these were to AFD discussions. The account exists for votestacking and has been blocked.
 * Delete for lack of independent sources to meet GNG. LibStar (talk) 12:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.