Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinnacle CEO Recruiters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. WjBscribe 13:27, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Pinnacle CEO Recruiters

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Not enough independent sources known to establish notability per WP:CORP. My PROD was contested, and one source added. Access is restricted, i.e. I can't read this source, but the summary specifies its word count as 64, so I doubt it contains substantial coverage about the company. Anyway, multiple sources would need to be present by WP:CORP. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding (talk) 17:27, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Service firms that don't deal with the public at large are going to have a relatively harder time meeting WP:CORP. Pay-per-view sources don't really establish anything, and it sounds like this one would be little more than a directory listing. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 18:05, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per initial nomination as a7, g11! We need to start removing spam and articles without clearly established notability using the speedy process.  Clearly, a speedy nomination then a prod and now a full AfD is not the best use of anyones time. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:13, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Fortunately, few PRODs actually get contested (I'd estimate 10-20% from experience). --B. Wolterding (talk) 19:23, 17 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.