Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinnacle Towers Tower Mooringsport


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Pinnacle Towers Tower Mooringsport


The end is in sight for mast stub deletions. I'm nominating this [final] batch of US masts for deletion (below 580m in height). As before, none of the masts that I am nominating are notable in any way whatsoever, as far as I can tell. Most stubs are over a year old, and have remained in the same, sorry vegetative state since creation, some have not even been categorised, and none have any substantial information other than which already exists, albeit in more concise but no less informative tabular form, in List of masts, so I see no point in redirecting. Delete per WP:NN, WP:NOT, WP:NOT. (see here for rationale and fuller list of precedents and here for remaining prods) Ohconfucius 04:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - more nn tall things. Squiddy | (squirt ink?)  14:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Stub articles lack independent sources for notability of fungible tall objects. Edison 14:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete one of the few true examples of "cruft" that still exists on WP (and I hate the term cruft, by the way). Basically just a holdover from WP's early "anything goes" days which have now worn out their welcome. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.