Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinwinnie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus defaults to keep with no prejudice toward suggested merger. Beeblebrox (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Pinwinnie

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No indication that it meets notability criteria - no significant coverage in third-party sources. 98.248.33.198 (talk) 22:11, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Note: submitting in good faith for IP. tedder (talk) 15:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:59, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge to Inver House Distillers Limited per WP:PRODUCT: "Information on products and services should generally be included in the article on the company itself, unless the company article is so large that this would make the article unwieldy." Pinwinnie gets ten words in the Wordsworth Dictionary of Drink, and pretty much nothing else I can find.    Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 06:21, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.