Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pioneer HPM-100


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 03:25, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Pioneer HPM-100

 * – ( View AfD View log  HPM-100 Stats )

Deletion for this article is contested. The article has been up for years, but an editor has tagged it for speedy and was reverted by IP. History also shows a contested PROD, so I'm going to let consensus decide if this product is notable. NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 03:37, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

*Keep. I see no evidence that this article fails to meet any criteria. Wikitam331 (talk) 15:28, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The fact that the only reference is to an advert, coupled with poor results for a Google search, seem to me evidence that it may not meet WP:GNG. Unless you know other sources? --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

*comment needs more sources to show notability/impact, otherwise I'd say delete or merge. PeteBaltar (talk) 04:45, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Weak delete for now, if sources can be found the article can be recreated. FurrySings (talk) 06:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep as device is well covered topic in many articles:, ,  , but still needs improvements and more references.  Alex discussion ★ 16:04, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:58, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I followed three of those five links, two did not even mention this product/topic. Huw Powell (talk) 02:35, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Followed the other two, nothing there either. Changing my !vote below. Huw Powell (talk) 07:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Strong delete. Current article's only source is an advertisement, and content reads like one - actually is mostly quoted from the ad.  If there are real sources available to build an article on this topic, then let it be written based on them.  As of now, this seems no more encyclopedic than if I wrote an article on every speaker I could come up with based on manufacturer's advertising.  And by that I don't mean "other stuff exists", I mean this one, as it stands, shouldn't. Huw Powell (talk) 02:33, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.