Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pioneer Resources (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:54, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Pioneer Resources
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

Aware of the Prior AfD, and understand why it was a valid speedy keep, but I do not believe this company meets WP:ORG. The best source found via a BEFORE, which I'm not sure meets WP:RS, notes that the company formerly known as Pioneer: "is a classic small fry WA goldfields explorer with excellent management connections and a promising mix of gold, nickel and lithium assets." Nothing else found counters the "classic small fry" designation and I can find no significant, in depth coverage. Note: this is not the Dallas-based company with a similar name. Should this be kept, it probably needs moving to itsnew name. Star   Mississippi  17:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  17:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  17:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  Star   Mississippi  17:03, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 21:57, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, fails WP:ORG. I cannot find any sources other than share prices and a few one-sentence descriptions therein. There are a few stories out there about the Sinclair Caesium Mine but none go into detail about the company itself, and it does not WP:INHERIT notability from that. LizardJr8 (talk) 20:36, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I couldn't find any reliable sources via a Proquest database search of Australian and NZ newspapers, just a brief, incidental mention in a 2003 The Age newspaper article, and a 2006 The Australian article. Given the entity delisted in the early 2000s if there were any notable articles this search should have found them. Cabrils (talk) 02:14, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.4meter4 (talk) 12:09, 24 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.