Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pioneer Valley Educational Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 07:56, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Pioneer Valley Educational Press

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable publisher, no substantial information, no sources, no improvements since creation in 2006. Rhododendrites (talk) 21:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:43, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:43, 1 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - We can most definitely work on this article because the publisher's publications are well known and easily checked by a Google search. As a whole, the publication of so many books at least confers that as a publisher their publications are all reliably sourcable and so is their market and history. I'm a bit concerned about deleting the stub simply because it isn't the most notable thing in the world - it is a publisher after all, but its function operation and details are all easily sourcable so on these grounds I'm leaning keep. It just needs work. 209.255.230.32 (talk) 12:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:28, 3 November 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - Company has not received significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. --Hirolovesswords (talk) 21:52, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 05:42, 9 November 2013 (UTC)


 * strong delete the only gnews hit is its own website. Fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 02:17, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.