Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piontakism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. W.marsh 18:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Piontakism


Non-notable, if true. "Joy Piontak" returns 4 ghits, and including Dr. brings it down to 0. Piontakism returns none, either. Also, we're still in the early 21st century, so how someone would know what happens later is beyond me. Contested prod. Amarkov babble 15:49, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:V. -  SpLoT  / (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination and WP:V Xdenizen 19:36, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Fails almost every Wiki policy I can think of. --- RockMFR 23:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per everyone. Article does not qualify for a speed deletion. —Mitaphane talk 00:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Oakshade 23:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.