Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pip: the story of olive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 12:48, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Pip: the story of olive

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

It's a book, so no speedy; WP:N Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 08:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, no references or sources whatsoever. Nothing to indicate this book even exists. J I P  &#124; Talk 08:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Should be a category for this. Not even a suggestion of notability. Shadowjams (talk) 08:49, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a single source, not even sure does it exist. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 09:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak delete it definitely exists, and the Amazon page excerpts reviews from The Melbourne Age and Adelaide Independent Weekly, among others. But that said I'm not sure it passes WP:BK and the state of the article is poor enough that it may be better to start over regardless. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:24, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, Sadads (talk) 05:26, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.