Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pipariya Parivar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 23:08, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Pipariya Parivar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be about a family in Gujarat, India, with no claim made for notability. A previous discussion suggested that CSD A7 may not apply to "an extended family over time" which this is likely to be. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion/Archive_44#Does_A7_apply_to_a_tribe_.2F_family_.2F_surname_.3F Noyster   (talk),  18:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 30 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Almost looks like it is about multiple minor Hindu goddeses, but the article is very hard to read. No clear statement of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 04:02, 6 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: no claim to notability. The article's subject is unclear; the only intelligible section bears no apparent relation to the title, and is an unencyclopaedic version of a religious story without references. BethNaught (talk) 16:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: Article created by SPA User:Pipariyah fails WP:GNG. Anupmehra  - Let's talk!  20:21, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.