Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pipetalk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Carlossuarez46 19:13, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Pipetalk

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I am nominating this article for deletion because Wikipedia is not a manual. Also, this seems to be a neologism, and the article is not sources or wikified. aBSuRDiST -T J C- 04:40, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete A google search shows up no reliable hits for this article. It also impossible to verify the contents of this article. -- S iva1979 Talk to me 05:52, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as probable advertisment - given the creator is, I suspect some promotional relationship to PIPEtalk pipe estimation software, whose page also mentions this TX 5-367-631 patent. Gordonofcartoon 14:59, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable and the author appears to be a SPA -- Gudeldar 19:22, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.