Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirated movie release types


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 19:17, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Pirated movie release types

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article does not contain any reliable sources and my searches failed to locate any to back up the information within. Wikipedia is not a guide to choosing the quality of your pirated film releases either. -- Longhair\talk 01:55, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- Longhair\talk 12:14, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced, although somewhat interesting. Steve Dufour (talk) 06:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Question I think this is not categorized entirely correctly. Does anyone know how to contact the WikiProject Movies. They could be able to help reference this. - Mgm|(talk) 10:59, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Try Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films perhaps? I'm convinced the categories of Category:Copyright infringement and Category:Warez are suitable. The remaining category is a matter of opinion. -- Longhair\talk 12:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep But still of course the article needs citation. But I don't think it's right to go straight to AfD. Guy0307 (talk) 11:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC). Guy0307 (talk) 11:19, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- Longhair\talk 12:12, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete seems legitimate, but nontheless unsourced original research. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 15:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Legitimate and viable topic; I say keep it but put the call out to the Films Wikiproject, etc. to add sources. Most of these formats have been referenced in news coverage of this issue. 23skidoo (talk) 17:01, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Needs citations, but material is worthwhile and structured well. Article is used for law enforcement and network security reference. Rurik (talk) 19:31, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. References to these formats can be found at http://www.latinodivx.com and many other places. 30 October 2008
 * Merge into digital piracy, which for some reason is now redirected into a rather poor article on copyright infringement. Information on the means of piracy is notable. I agree that the article could be pared down a lot. Mangoe (talk) 16:34, 31 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.