Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirates of the Caribbean: 4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy Delete. Textbook case of a WP:CRYSTAL violation, and the sort of conditions that WP:SNOW was written about. We've all got better things to spend our time on. :) EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 17:29, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Pirates of the Caribbean: 4

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wildly premature article full of speculation. No confirmation that this movie will be made. Prod tag removed with a rewrite, but still doesn't pass WP:CRYSTAL. Resolute 13:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete per WP:CRYSTAL; I might consider an IAR speedy here because this really has no chance of becoming a legitimate article. Yechiel Man 13:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. This film may not get made, and Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of facts, not a fan's hyperbole. Alientraveller 14:19, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. The very writing itself reflects the uncertainty of a fourth film.  In addition, the well-cited Pirates of the Caribbean films covers potential development in a proper location that does not violate WP:CRYSTAL. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions.   -- Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Maybe," "possibly," and "probably" -- sheesh!  Definitive and properly sourced information, once it becomes available, can be listed at the parent article, as Erik stated above.  María ( críticame ) 15:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. May I reccomend the creator reading WP:CRYSTAL??? Jonjonbt on a wikibreak
 * Delete per above, violates WP:CRYSTAL. Speaking of speculation, my own crystal ball reveals a lot of snow in this article's future ..  Ark yan  &#149; (talk) 16:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.