Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirates of the Caribbean (Disneyland)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Pirates of the Caribbean (attraction). Any substantial sourced content can be merged from the history to the extent consensus exists for that.  Sandstein  09:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Pirates of the Caribbean (Disneyland)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Orphaned and unnecessary redundant fork of Pirates of the Caribbean (attraction). Previous attempts to merely keep this page as a redirect were reverted. Zzyzx11 (talk) 07:53, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect and merge if possible. Buggie111 (talk) 13:24, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete, or Redirect to Pirates of the Caribbean (attraction). The Disneyland version is already extensively covered in the "attraction" article, so there is little or nothing that needs merging. I'm not sure I see any point to keeping this as a redirect page, but as the saying goes, redirects are cheap. --MelanieN (talk) 16:02, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * P.S. If the decision is "redirect": Considering that previous redirects were reverted by the article's creator no less than five times, maybe the page should be protected after a redirect. --MelanieN (talk) 16:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 *  Move Pirates of the Caribbean (attraction) to this title Redirect to Pirates of the Caribbean (attraction) We obviously don't need both articles; but I feel that the Disneyland title is the more useful of the two  Purpleback pack  89  ≈≈≈≈  17:06, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment That would be inappropriate, because the "attraction" article also includes information about the Pirates rides in Florida, Tokyo, and Paris. --MelanieN (talk) 18:18, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Right. Forgot about those johnnie-come-latelies. (SoCal for the win!)  Purpleback  pack  89  ≈≈≈≈  20:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep - it seems that the Disneyland ride more than meets the notability guidelines - if someone thinks that there is a redundancy, remove the excess in the "attraction article" leaving just the summary and provide a link to the detailed article on the subject. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 6 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge & Redirect; although the subject is notable, it is not any more notable than any other of its sister rides. If there can be references from reliable sources that can show it is notable in its own right individually, not just as the ride itself, then I may change my current opinion. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete & Redirect; unless this ride is uniquely different than the main one (which nothing suggests it is) there is no reason to have a separate article. I have not checked, but it is likely the same (or similar) design. Lord Roem (talk) 19:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * MergeLuciferWildCat (talk) 19:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.