Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pirates of the caribean 4


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 00:04, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Pirates of the caribean 4

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

PROD was removed. Page about a future movie with little detail. Not worth keeping at this point, even as a redirect because it is misspelled. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 13:59, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as it stands now the article is speedible for lack of content. Previously, it was speediable as vandalism. Beyond that the subject fails your choice of criteria ( notability, reliable sources,  Future Films,  original research, and probably a few more. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:10, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. In its current form it's just the Prod piped parameters. Prior version was blog-class blurbs and speculation. While there's probably a 100% chance the movie will be made, until there's some real information, this article should go. Arakunem Talk 14:17, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above; even in its original state, it was nothing but speculation. Until it can be verified by reliable sources that principal photography has begun, info on a fourth Pirates film belongs in Pirates of the Caribbean (film series).  Cliff smith  talk  15:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - no RS. Karanacs (talk) 15:32, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete — Little or no content. Also a textbook failure of WP:CBALL. As mentioned above, redirection is out of the question because of the misspelling. MuZemike  17:10, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pirates of the Caribbean (film series), as even with the mispelled name it's still a possible search term. While we're at it, suggest creating redirect for the proper spelling, too. There has been media coverage of Depp being signed to do a fourth film, but otherwise it's all WP:CRYSTAL as to whether the film is even going to be made. 23skidoo (talk) 19:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect per 23skidoo. Propaniac (talk) 19:33, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect per 23skidoo; misspelling is not unlikely. Owen&times; &#9742;  15:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redirection should be placed on Pirates of the Carribean 4; it shouldn't be put here.    The Morid  i  a  n   18:52, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree, there should be a redirect at Pirates of the Carribean 4, as well as Pirates of the Caribbean 4 (which is probably what you were going for) and perhaps POTC 4, because these are all titles that could plausibly be entered by a user looking for info on the fourth Pirates of the Caribbean film. There is absolutely no restriction on how many redirects can be created to any title (as long as each redirect has some reasonable justification for existing), nor would imposing such a restriction make any sense at all. Propaniac (talk) 23:11, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I used 'Carribean' on purpose; I assumed that here already would be a redirect on 'Caribbean', so I didn't mention it. I didn't get my spelling wrong or anything. ;)   The Morid  i  a  n   17:29, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —PC78 (talk) 11:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.