Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pisces (notable persons)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete all. —Quarl (talk) 2007-01-01 04:14Z 

Pisces (notable persons)

 * — (View AfD)



This is a simple list of links intended to include one-twelfth of all Wiki-biographies &mdash; i.e., entirely free from information, ludicrously broad in scope, and based on an utterly meaningless random criterion. Previously proposed deletion was accepted without objection, but the article was silently recreated (note blank talk page). Recommend deletion and blank-page protection. ➥the Epopt 06:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. One-twelfth of the entire population? Delete as an indiscriminate list. Also, there are, not surprisingly, other lists floating around:
 * Gemini (notable persons)
 * Cancer (notable persons)
 * Aquarius (notable persons)
 * Aries (notable persons)
 * Taurus (notable persons)

The other signs of the zodiac ought to receive pre-emptive salting if this passes. --Calton | Talk 07:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - arbitary indiscriminate listcruft. MER-C 08:15, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, and someone should AFD the others, and salt the remaining. Charlie 08:21, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete unmaintainable and inherently POV (that eternal problem of "who decides who is notable?"). I agree the others should be proposed for speedy depending on the outcome here -Markeer 13:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all, the others should be combined with this nom. Or is Aries more notable than Taurus? --Dhartung | Talk 14:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Your horoscope for today: avoid rainclouds and don't take any wooden nickels, and try not to be upset if the Wikipedia article about you is deleted.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  17:25, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all. This is such a no brainer, I'm not even sure what to say. 129.98.212.73 18:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, speculative. Punkmorten 21:31, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all, can this be serious? CRGreathouse (t | c) 10:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete completely arbitrary scope, no added value.-- danntm T C 16:14, 28 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.