Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pisenlav


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:36, 31 January 2017 (UTC)

Pisenlav

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability under the criteria of WP:MUSIC. Only one EP release. Lacks sources. Karst (talk) 15:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:32, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:32, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:27, 17 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: A longstanding WP:SPA article, all of whose references are not now accessible. My searches are finding nothing better, including Highbeam which is usually pretty good on Philippines media sources. Fails WP:MUSICBIO. AllyD (talk) 11:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, if we can't verify the information with references, we can't confirm they have enough notability to meet WP:BAND. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 10:35, 31 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.