Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pishakhor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 23:27, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Pishakhor

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:PLACEOUTCOMES. No notable source. Hongsy (talk) 14:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Hongsy (talk) 14:44, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:26, 28 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment: Reference #2 is the official Census of Iran. If a town or district is listed on their spreadsheet for this region (#09 in this case), then it's officially recognized per WP:GEOLAND and therefore notable. @Hongsy, is Pishakhor listed? Checking references is part of WP:BEFORE.
 * Thanks,
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 17:35, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 17:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - This is an abadi, which should not be understood as necessarily being the same as a "village" even if it is sometimes translated that way. In reality many abadi on the Iranian census are simply named locations (factories/farms/pumps/bridges etc.) that the census was taken near. For this reason, abadi are explicitly excluded from GEOLAND. In this case, there does appear to be a place called روستای پیش آخور (which Google Translate tells me means Pisakhur village) at the location given in the article so at least this can be verified in a very basic way. The population is also large enough that this place should eventually be given official status as a village (supposedly given to anywhere with a population over ~100). For these reasons I am inclined to keep bt the information supporting this article is very scanty. FOARP (talk) 10:43, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per FOARP's insights.
 * -- A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 02:03, 12 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.