Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piston,Crankshaft Design


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. causa sui (talk) 16:40, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

Piston,Crankshaft Design

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Student essay and fork of piston and crankshaft. &mdash; RHaworth 20:06, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:06, 4 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as essay. Mangoe (talk) 02:00, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Student book report on subjects considered at length elsewhere in WP. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 02:39, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as an essay. When I originally  investigated this article I  found also  that  it  is a close paraphrasing  (duplication  detector) of too  many  web sites and blogs to  list  them  all. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:34, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Close without prejudice to future action. This is another IEP article and once again it's just another unstructured factoid dump. However this issue is much bigger than the normal AfD traffic and AfD is neither the location nor process to sort this situation out. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:59, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.